Here you can find your own jammer

Expanding the scope of cell phone jammer applications
Initially designed for law enforcement to intercept messages from terrorists and criminals, cell phone jammers have undergone substantial developments. Today, they are not only essential in the battle against terrorism but can also serve various official and civilian purposes. Their effectiveness in blocking communications as a preventive measure against organized crime and in deactivating remote-controlled bomb detonations makes them indispensable in modern security protocols. Moreover, there have been incidents where signal jammers
have thwarted assassination attempts on influential leaders, emphasizing their critical role in high-risk security scenarios.
Technological advances enhance jamming capabilities
Cell phone jammers are effective due to the advanced technology they utilize. These devices emit specific signals that interfere with the remote-controlled receiver, preventing the execution of any coded commands. It is important to highlight that this interference is localized to a designated area, ensuring that devices outside of this protected zone remain unaffected. This precision is crucial for maintaining seamless communication over a wider area while securing the target location.
Jammers utilize specially encoded signals to mislead GSM device receivers, hindering phones from establishing connections with their base stations. This advanced technique guarantees that any endeavor to communicate via mobile phone within the jammed region is effectively obstructed, while legitimate communications outside the jammed region remain unaffected.
Applications Beyond Terrorism<

1. Educational Institutions:
   - Cell phone jammers are increasingly used in educational institutions to prevent cheating in exams. By blocking signals within exam rooms, authorities can ensure a fair exam environment.


2. Prisons and Detention Centers:
   - In detention centers, jammers are essential to prevent inmates from making unauthorized calls, which could coordinate criminal activity outside the facility.


3. Corporate Security:
   - Companies use jammers to protect sensitive information during high-level meetings, ensuring that no unauthorized recording or transmission occurs.


4. Public Events and Venues:
   - During large public events such as concerts or sporting events, jammers can prevent disruptions and ensure the safety of attendees by blocking potential threats such as remote control devices.


5. Hospitals:
   - In medical settings, jammers help maintain security in areas where cell phone signals could interfere with sensitive medical equipment.

The advantages of cell phone jammers are apparent, yet their ethical and legal implications must be taken into account. The rules governing the deployment of jammers vary from country to country and region to region. In many areas, their usage is restricted to authorized personnel and specific scenarios to prevent any potential misuse and ensure the continuous availability of emergency communication services.
As technology progresses, the potential of cell phone jammers is poised to grow. Anticipated advancements may encompass refined targeting mechanisms to minimize unintended disruptions, improved portability for swift deployment in dynamic scenarios, and fortified encryption to guarantee the invulnerability of jamming signals.
Cell phone jammers have transformed from a niche law enforcement tool to a versatile device with widespread use in security, privacy, and public safety. By leveraging advanced technology, these devices play a vital role in protecting against threats ranging from terrorism to cheating on exams. However, their use must be strictly regulated to balance security needs with individual rights and freedoms. As we move forward, the continued development of jamming technology promises to enhance our ability to protect and secure society from emerging challenges.

The presence of discontent is crucial for the evolution of individuals, communities, and civilization. Although too much dissatisfaction can be harmful, an appropriate level of discontent can be highly beneficial. If everyone is content with the current state of affairs, there will be no drive for advancement, leading to the potential downfall of humanity. In this piece, we will explore the necessity of discontent in the development of cell phone signal jammers.
The primary objective of a cell phone signal jammer is to hinder unauthorized communication signals as required. This particular device is highly suitable for individuals employed in various government and correctional institutions. However, it is essential to recognize that signal jammers have the ability to obstruct communications, which can pose a significant security threat.
It is evident that certain facilities require security measures for obvious reasons. For instance, military facilities strictly enforce a communication protocol that necessitates prior approval.
Cell phones play an important role in our daily life. Why are there cell phone blockers now? Dissatisfaction is dissatisfaction, dissatisfaction with the improper use of mobile phones in some formal occasions. Discontent is also a driving force of human civilization as a whole. It can be said that in primitive society, science came into being because ancestors were not satisfied with their understanding of the world, and technology came into being because ancestors were not satisfied with simple manual labor. This curiosity and desire, in fact, also led to the prosperity of technology later.
Use jammers to prevent interference and block unauthorized communications
Utilizing a signal jammer is crucial to prevent disruptions and improve your quality of life. The use of cell phone jammers by individuals is prohibited in numerous countries. It is recommended to research the regulations in your local area. In some instances, people install jammers, such as cell phone jammers, to avoid interference. If it is legal in your country, you can acquire a beneficial jamming device.
Whether it happens within a classroom, conference room, presentation, or religious service, an ill-timed phone call can create significant disruptions. However, the implementation of cell phone jammers can effectively prevent such calls from occurring altogether. By utilizing these devices, interference and unwanted phone noise can be blocked, providing you with the capability to maintain uninterrupted proceedings.
Ever come across this scenario? The phone rang incessantly, yet no one bothered to address the disturbance. You voiced out, "Kindly silence your phone." Alas, your request fell on deaf ears. In a large group setting, instructing individuals to mute their devices proves futile. A substantial number will inevitably keep their phones active for various reasons. The solution? A cell phone jammer.
While there may be differing opinions on whether this indicates a larger societal problem, the truth remains unaltered. Even at funerals, it is unavoidable that there will be occasional phone calls to break the silence or offer prayers.
Irrespective of the situation, the signal jammer is able to interfere with the frequency needed for the phone to receive calls, effectively stopping the phone from ringing.

The driver who equipped his work van with a laser jamming device in order to avoid speeding tickets has been sentenced to a suspended jail term, fined £3000, and placed on a two-month curfew.
The jury at Swansea Crown Court reached a verdict of guilt against Jason Moore for perverting the course of justice by equipping a Laser Star jamming device on a VW Transporter van to obstruct a laser speed camera operator from Dyfed-Powys Police in ascertaining the speed of the vehicle.
The court was informed by prosecutor James Hartson that in September 2018, the van was witnessed driving at high speed as it neared the speed camera situated near Nantyci Showground on the A40, St Clears, heading towards Camarthen.
Upon attempting to gauge the speed of the vehicle, the camera operator was met with an error message on the device. Nonetheless, the operator had been educated by experts at Road Safety Support to distinguish the atypical circumstances that could prompt the appearance of this error message.
Seeking assistance from Road Safety Support, Dyfed-Powys Police turned to Steve Callaghan, an expert in forensic video analysis and laser jamming, who is employed by the company.
After being sent a copy of the video, Mr. Callaghan acknowledged the presence of a suspect device in the footage. Furthermore, he identified that the laser jammers was emitting light from the van's grille while error messages were being generated by the laser speedmeter.
As a consequence of Mr. Callaghan's preliminary examination and counsel given to Dyfed-Powys Police, the van was retrieved to facilitate testing of the device and evidence collection.
A thorough report was produced, presenting the examination results and the incident's context, in which the speed measurement was unattainable. Road Safety Support identified that the van was traveling at a speed of 72 mph, exceeding the maximum permitted speed of 60 mph.
Mr. Moore professed his ignorance regarding the Laser Star jamming system's capability to block the speed measurement function of a police speedmeter. He insisted that he had acquired the device for its parking sensor function only.
Mr. Moore designated David Winstanley, a retired police collision investigator, who professed to possess ample knowledge in laser and video systems, to be his expert witness.
The stance taken by Mr. Winstanley was that the Laser Star is to be sold as a 'parking sensor' and not to be perceived primarily as a laser jamming device.
Mr. Callaghan responded by explaining that the utilization of a laser beam to identify parking obstructions was completely unsuitable and mostly ineffective. He clarified that a parking sensor does not have to be programmed to disrupt a laser speedmeter. Moreover, the Laser Star is advertised as having the ability to disrupt speed cameras in its instructions and marketing materials, a feature that is not characteristic of a parking sensor.
Furthermore, Mr. Moore pointed out in his justification that the security company he was employed by mandated that employees take responsibility for any damage caused to work vehicles. He stated that he installed the device to decrease the chances of damage.
The jury's verdict was guilty for Moore, who was then sentenced at Swansea Crown Court on October 18, 2021.
Describing Moore's defense as groundless, Judge Vosper QC indicated that he was not taken aback by the jury's dismissal of it.
Moore has been given a suspended sentence of 32 weeks' custody, which will be in effect for a period of 2 years. In addition, he has been mandated to pay costs and fines amounting to £3,000, and a curfew has been imposed upon him for two months.
Can police tell if you have a laser jammer?
Upon aiming a lidar gun at a vehicle, the police may encounter an error message of either "no response" or cosine error. This error message leaves the police officers uncertain as to whether the vehicle is equipped with a laser signal jammers or if they have inaccurately targeted the vehicle. Consequently, this grants the driver an opportunity to make speed adjustments before the police can retrieve the data once again.
Since police need to be stationary and able to see a vehicle at close range without cover for lidar to work properly, if police receive a false response the first time they fire their lidar gun, the targeted driver will likely have time to adjust his speed when out of range. Lidar is most often used by motorcycle police or identifiable patrol cars, who use it most effectively on major roads, which limits when and where they can be used. In the case of heavy traffic, the police lidar gun is very effective at focusing on the vehicle and instantly calculating its speed, distance and direction.

A Fairhope man was charged last week with interfering with a 911 dispatch call, and new court documents show a similar thing happened at the same apartment building a month earlier.
The residents of the apartment were the first to know and called the police.
On June 6, Trenton Lisak, 31, allegedly interfered with 911 dispatch calls from the Mobile Police Department, Fire Rescue, the sheriff and even the Metropolitan Jail in the downtown entertainment district. Police say Lissak carried out the well-planned attack from an apartment in downtown Mobile.
"People with these kinds of resources obviously cause a lot of concern," said Michael Kraus, a resident of the apartment building.
In a moment of life and death, this can be catastrophic
Officials at the Mobile County 911 Center told FOX10 News that detectives traced the disturbance to the 9th floor, where they found Lisak as well as the black market mobile jammer.
Now, new court documents show that a month ago, multiple tenants in the building complained that Wi-Fi and phones were not working.
Investigators said at the time that AT&T had gone to the apartment where Lissak was staying and told a tenant to stop interfering. After the disruption stopped, it began again on June 6. At that time detectives found the strongest signal jamming at the same door.
Kraus, who lives on a nearby floor, said the poor Wi-Fi signal affected his remote work for weeks
"Things are moving slowly, and I can see that there are issues like connectivity issues and interference," Krause said. "To me personally, it was very different, but after he left, or in this case, I guess arrested him, everything seemed to go back to normal." Since you told me it was on the 9th, that must explain a lot."
Court records show that Lissak is no stranger to the law. He was jailed for unrelated crimes, including a burglary in Baldwin County.
911 service director Charlie McNicol said Lissack's motive was unclear.
"He could have a variety of reasons, like he just likes to watch chaos, or he has mental issues, or unfortunately, he could be planning a major event and want to ensure public safety by interfering with communications," McNicol said.
Other residents told FOX10 News reporter Lacey Beasley that they saw SWAT officers enter the building the day Lisak was arrested.
But employees at the apartment said he did not live there.
The FBI is investigating.

The CTA passenger, a 63-year-old man from Chicago, faced charges on Tuesday for allegedly resorting to an illegal device in order to enjoy some peace and quiet.
According to CBS 2's Audrina Bigos, this is not the first time the man has been accused of jamming cell phones, and the significant number of complaints about dropped calls has caused some alarm.
Dressed in business casual attire and a ball cap, Dennis Nicholl, a certified public accountant, was released from jail after being charged with a felony for using a signal jamming device.
Keegan Goudie observed that the device stood out significantly, prompting him and his brother to share their experience on thesixthirty.com after coming across it on the CTA Red Line.
Chas observed that he was likely involved in nefarious activities, and that the device appeared to be unsuitable for him to be in possession of.
Cell phone jamming devices are available for purchase online, with prices typically falling between $30 and $300. It is important to note that federal law prohibits the sale, purchase, or use of these devices. These signal blocker are designed to disrupt cell phone signals, police communications, and emergency calls.
According to Keegan, it exemplifies the potential of any individual when it comes to security and the risks posed by terrorists in a major city.
After an extensive investigation spanning months, the Chicago Police responded to complaints of dropped calls on the Red Line. Following a tip from a 911 caller, the notorious Nicholl was apprehended by undercover officers on a CTA platform on Tuesday and is now facing a felony charge.
Attorney Charles Lauer clarified that there was no intention to cause harm to anyone.

Nicholl's legal representative asserts that his client's intention behind using the jammer was solely to escape the annoyance caused by the multitude of individuals engrossed in their cell phones, in order to find some peace and quiet.
According to the FCC regulations, individuals caught using cell phone blocker may be sentenced to prison and fined significantly. The fines can go up to $16,000 per violation or reach a maximum of $112,000 for a single offense.
After being bailed out, Nicholl left jail on Wednesday night.

What’s the context?
US prison officials harness new technology to crack down on contraband cellphones but some still want powers to jam signals

• South Carolina programme shuts off more than 800 phones


• Federal action on broader signal jamming tech seen as unlikely


• Activists raise privacy, rights concerns for prisoners

RICHMOND, Virginia - As director of South Carolina's Department of Corrections, Bryan Stirling believes he knows what is needed to make the state's 21 penal institutions safer while also protecting people outside the prison walls.
Ideally, Stirling would like to have the power to jam phone signals from the state's prisons to tackle the scourge of illegal cellphones being used to facilitate crimes ranging from sex trafficking to murder-for-hire and drug dealing.
But this action has been prohibited under federal law for decades, and there is no immediate sign of change despite numerous appeals from law enforcement officers across the country, including a letter from top state prosecutors to the leaders of Congress last year.
With no movement likely in the near future, South Carolina opted for a pilot programme that allowed authorities in Lee Correctional Institution to identify and shut down contraband cellphones. More than 800 phones have been shut off at Lee since last July, out of an inmate population of about 1,100.
"We call it a pilot, but it's basically the system in there now," said Stirling. "We are using this technology in Lee and we will continue to use this technology until we can secure the money to do it everywhere."

Cellphone jammers not enough to block calls from prisoners

1. This is the view of senior prison officials who tell the Sunday Express that even though signal blocker (which they say are operational) are used to block signals from cellphones within the prisons, other interception technologies are needed for the system to be effective.


2. “Cellphone jammers are being used. But they need to be in use with other technologies like Wi-Fi jammers to be truly effective. We can see this in other jurisdictions. But it’s yet to be properly utilised here.


3. “So you will have prisoners with cellphones and tablets who cannot make calls. But they can use either the phone’s data, or if they have access to a hot-spot device or a Wi-Fi box, they will be able to make calls via social media apps. These include things like WhatsApp, Facebook and Instagram. So there is still the issue of communication with the outside world. Communication is still being made.


4. “In other jurisdictions, you will see the cellphone jammers being used with other interception devices to determine the frequencies used by these devices, and then target those specific frequencies. If this is not done, then it’s almost like spinning top in mud,” a senior source in the Prison Service explained yesterday.

The purpose of a laser jammer is to cause a laser radar gun to display a "no response" or cosine error when directed towards a vehicle. Consequently, the police officer aiming the gun remains unaware of whether the vehicle possesses a laser jammer or if their targeting is simply incorrect.
A laser jammer is a device that sends back a "no response" or cosine error signal when a police officer aims a laser radar gun at a vehicle. This error signal makes it impossible for the police officer to determine if the vehicle is using a laser jammers or if they are just not targeting the vehicle accurately.
How to jam police lasers?
In order to successfully neutralize a laser, the front laser signal jammers
must prioritize the safeguarding of the headlights, license plate, and the reflective surfaces surrounding them. On the other hand, at the rear, the main targets are the license plate and tail lights. Additionally, the center high-mounted stop light, backup lights, and vertical reflective surfaces are also susceptible to laser attacks. Interestingly, even a tailgate-mounted spare tire/wheel assembly can be fair game, as demonstrated by our successful targeting of a Jeep Wrangler's aluminum spare wheel from a distance of 2,500 feet.
Can you install a laser jammer on your car?
California Vehicle Code Section 28150 (Division 12: Equipment of Vehicles, Chapter 5: Other Equipment, Article 17: Jamming Devices) states the following:
(a) No vehicle shall be equipped with any device that is designed for, or is capable of, jamming, scrambling, neutralizing, disabling, or otherwise interfering with radar, laser, or any other electronic device used by a law enforcement agency to measure the speed of moving objects.
(b) No person shall use, buy, possess, manufacture, sell, or otherwise distribute any device that is designed for jamming, scrambling, neutralizing, disabling, or otherwise interfering with radar, laser, or any other electronic device used by a law enforcement agency to measure the speed of moving objects.
(c) Except as provided in subdivision (d), a violation of subdivision (a) or (b) is an infraction.
(d) When a person possesses four or more devices in violation of subdivision (b), the person is guilty of a misdemeanor.
(e) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, a person who has a valid federal license for operating the devices described in this section may transport one or more of those devices if the license is carried in the vehicle transporting the device at all times when the device is being transported.
Can police radar measure speeds or more than one vehicle?
Dash-mounted police radars are able to measure the speed of two or more vehicles simultaneously.
In the present day, radar technology permits the targeting of multiple vehicles at once, allowing for the identification of the fastest vehicle in a group and the vehicle with the emest radar signal reflection simultaneously. However, visual confirmation by the officer is required to determine the fastest vehicle among those targeted.

Back in 2011, the Payson Police Department thought they were obtaining a cell phone jammers from a government program that distributes surplus military equipment to law enforcement agencies. To their surprise, they received a smokescreen device from a U.S. Navy ship.
“The ‘Electronic Countermeasures’ were supposed to be cell phone jamming devices. However, what was sent were smoke machines off of a naval ship,” Chief of Police Ronald Tischer said in an email to Arizona Mirror. “So, we are in the process of sending them back. They were never used and have been in storage since 2011.”
The Mirror reached out to the Payson Police Department after analyzing data published by the Defense Logistics Agency about military equipment sent to local law enforcement agencies across the country. The department obtained two items listed as “electronic countermeasures” in 2011 both valued at roughly $4,800.
Company offering cell, drone and other jammers is fined $35 million
Yesterday, the Federal Communications Commission issued a penalty forfeiture order of $34.9 million against Chinese electronics manufacturer and online retailer C.T.S. Technology for marketing and selling signal jamming devices to American consumers, despite the potential difficulty in recovering the fine.
Referred to as "jammers," radio frequency transmitters are intentionally employed to obstruct, disrupt, or interfere with wireless communications, such as cell phone calls, GPS systems, Wi-Fi networks, and emergency communications.

The FCC's Enforcement Bureau has concluded an investigation and put forth a proposal to fine C.T.S. Technology a total of $34,912,500. This action has been taken in response to the company's marketing of 285 jammer models within the United States.
To comply with federal law, the FCC mandated that the company ensures its marketing activities are in accordance. While the company did not provide a response to the proposed fine, commonly referred to as a "Notice of Apparent Liability," it has subsequently implemented various measures to align its marketing practices with U.S. laws that prohibit the marketing, sale, and importation of signal jammers.
In light of C.T.S. Technology failing to submit any evidence to dispute the findings of the proposed fine, the Commission's decision yesterday, which was a formal forfeiture order, upheld the full proposed fine against the company.
But collecting that money may be difficult.
In compliance with international law, the FCC contacted the Chinese government to issue the NAL after C.T.S. did not acknowledge its receipt.
Despite the agency's request, China's designated service affairs agency dismissed it and determined that a forfeiture filing was the appropriate course of action.
C.T.S. has a 30-day deadline for payment. The FCC has not outlined any additional measures in case of non-payment.

Bear will make an effort to clarify the intricacies implicated. Initially, there arises the issue of what and how they are obstructing. Bear will assume that they are causing interference instead of engaging in hacking, as the latter involves an entirely separate affair.
If a human encounters a situation where the network connection to Ubear is lost while the phone, data service, and GPS remain functional, it is probable that the issue lies with the Ubear app. There is no need to assume that nearby drivers are causing interference. When Ubear experiences a loss of coverage, which is frequent in its mountainous environment, no special measures are required to restore access to U/L. This appears to be a problem related to the human's phone.
If human is being jammed, most off-the-shelf (all illegal) jammers are going to be broadband and omnidirectional. In fact, bear finds in a search that such devices advertise their broadband capability. So any driver using one is going to potentially take out not only cell service but also TV broadcast (which still uses the parts of the good ol' UHF band that haven't been sold to the cell providers) and possibly GPS, and maybe even local 2.4GHz services (wifi, bluetooth), within the range of cell phone jammers. These devices aren't exactly subtle and many of them have a stupid amount of broadcast power. Bear saw one device with 8W transmit; in comparison, bear's marine radio normally uses 1W, but if bear is about to drown (bear can swim quite well) and needs the Coast Guard to come from miles away to save bear, bear can kick it up to 25W which gives range of up to 60 miles (the Coast Guard has bigass antennae to receive).
As a result, signal jammers will effectively sabotage their own ability to receive any signal, thereby disconnecting themselves from the network.
Moreover, it is essential for a hotel to allocate a specific timeframe, typically lasting around an hour, for their busy checkout period. In a fixed location, this duration is set to a minimum of 15 minutes. This timeframe far exceeds the duration in which the irresponsible driver, who was apprehended for jamming a particular cell tower during his morning commute, would have been causing disruptions. If individuals are actively interfering with GPS signals, it is likely that military interests would also take notice. Without a doubt, any driver in Florida is never too far away from a Coast Guard asset.
It is conceivable that they possess a low-power device designed to function within a short distance. Evidently, they are aware of the human's habitual napping spot and take advantage of this knowledge. By positioning themselves directly next to the human, they momentarily disrupt their device's signal, exploiting the human's subpar phone that is susceptible to such interference. Wonderful! Now they simply need to repeat this procedure with the multitude of other ants present, as they continue to drive around.
All to earn $0.60/mile on a ride?
Version 1: Bear suggests that individuals maintain the operation of an additional service, like Pandora, while they take a nap. If Pandora does not encounter the same issues, it indicates that the person is not experiencing any interference (unless they are only disrupting the GPS, which should not require them to restart their phone as described).

A test receiver owned by the Bear is equipped to cover a wide range of bands, from FM to UHF, encompassing frequencies between 75 and 900MHz. Humans are graciously invited to borrow this receiver! By selecting a TV band that aligns with their local market and silencing the audio signal of the TV station, the human can effectively counteract interference. When
gps jammers is activated, its disruptive noise will surpass the squelch, ensuring the human's awareness.

Canada held a National Summit on Combatting Auto Theft on February 8, 2024 in Ottawa. The Summit sought to bring together stakeholders to solve this very serious problem.
A major outcome of the Summit is that the government will disrupt the supply chain that makes available devices that are often used in vehicle theft by criminals in the process of stealing vehicles.
Vehicle theft has grown to be a very critical issue in Canada: The country is seeking to mitigate this situation. News reports reveal that car thieves have developed systematic techniques where it is easy to obtain stolen vehicles for sale in other markets. The federal government with the support of advocates is implementing plans to reduce this problem.
Should vehicle manufacturers do more to stop vehicle theft?

This very question of more remedies needed to stop vehicle theft has stimulated the growth of Aftermarket solutions. Antitheft systems and devices are growing in popularity becuase some people feel insecure about simply replying on the vehicle manufactures built-in security systems. The Forbes article below highlights this concern:
"Manufacturers are always working to improve the anti-theft measures in vehicles, but thieves work just as hard to defeat them. According to FBI statistics, in 2020 the U.S. saw an 11.8% increase in car thefts over the prior year, and the trend has continued. The National Insurance Crime Bureau (NICB) reported that over 1 million vehicles were stolen in 2022. That’s a 7% increase over 2021, and the first time there were over 1 million vehicles stolen since 2008."
When the pickup truck was stolen, the thieves allegedly removed a factory-installed GPS tracker but the owner had his own backup plan: a second GPS tracker which was installed by a trained mechanic. This second telematics device enabled him to locate the Toyota Tundra at a parking lot in Toronto before he called the police.
The strategy of using a second backup tracker is a common strategy used all over the world: The typical weakness of this approach is Management and Maintenance. Management speaks to checking on the proper functioning of the Tracker at regular intervals. Maintenance requires prompt attention at the earliest signs of malfunction.
Information Risk
I believe that Information RISK is the typical reason why some persons chose backup security devices. Vehicle manufacturers adopt strategies to secure information on primary built-in tracking systems and devices so that vehicle security is not compromised. As the age old adage goes "a chain is as strong as its weakness link".
The vehicle service and maintenance information systems has to be distributed downstream involving more human players which inherently increases the risk that ethical issues may compromise security. How to prevent Information from being leaked to bad actors is always a systemic concern.
Information Risk Mitigation
The Information Risk Management (IRM) plan addresses the risk mitigation strategy using policies, technology and procedures to minimize the probability of information security leaks.
Once it becomes apparent that vehicles are being stolen despite the IRM being in place, data should be collected and analyzed to assess how the IRM can be strengthened. The spectrum of compromises varies from sharing of Master Access Codes, Encryption Algorithms or an individual in the Supply Chain informing criminal elements how to defeat the built-in security.
The tools devices generally used to steal vehicles include GPS and GSM Jammers.
GSM & GPS Jammers
Information on how to temporarily block GSM and GPS Signal jammers are readily available online.
Tech-Savvy criminals can learn and become proficient
The GPS Tracker which is an Internet of Things (IoT) device, detects the attempts to jam GSM and GPS transmissions: This electronic attack interferes with the operation of the tracker in it's function to protect the vehicle from being stolen. The small electronic circuit board within the device gathers GPS, GSM, Bluetooth data and other information that keeps the vehicle secure. Satellite data determines vehicle location and elevation.
Is the vehicle on a mountain road or driving through a tunnel under a river. The GSM module assists the GPS module by also providing tracking data based on Mobile Cellsite Towers: This information assists the GPS functionality of the tracker. The Mobile (GSM) data connectivity from the wireless telephone operators such as T-Mobile or Bell Mobility (Bell Canada) allows for the sending of Vehicle Tracking and Monitoring data from the Tracker to GPS Tracking platforms (Software) such as Navixy.com.